Attribute Naming

Status: Experimental

This section applies to Resource, Span, Log, and Metric attribute names (also known as the “attribute keys”). For brevity within this section when we use the term “name” without an adjective it is implied to mean “attribute name”.

Every name MUST be a valid Unicode sequence.

Note: we merely require that the names are represented as Unicode sequences. This specification does not define how exactly the Unicode sequences are encoded. The encoding can vary from one programming language to another and from one wire format to another. Use the idiomatic way to represent Unicode in the particular programming language or wire format.

Names SHOULD follow these rules:

  • Use namespacing to avoid name clashes. Delimit the namespaces using a dot character. For example service.version denotes the service version where service is the namespace and version is an attribute in that namespace.

  • Namespaces can be nested. For example telemetry.sdk is a namespace inside top-level telemetry namespace and telemetry.sdk.name is an attribute inside telemetry.sdk namespace. Note: the fact that an entity is located within another entity is typically not a sufficient reason for forming nested namespaces. The purpose of a namespace is to avoid name clashes, not to indicate entity hierarchies. This purpose should primarily drive the decision about forming nested namespaces.

  • For each multi-word dot-delimited component of the attribute name separate the words by underscores (i.e. use snake_case). For example http.status_code denotes the status code in the http namespace.

  • Names SHOULD NOT coincide with namespaces. For example if service.instance.id is an attribute name then it is no longer valid to have an attribute named service.instance because service.instance is already a namespace. Because of this rule be careful when choosing names: every existing name prohibits existence of an equally named namespace in the future, and vice versa: any existing namespace prohibits existence of an equally named attribute key in the future.

Name Pluralization guidelines

  • When an attribute represents a single entity, the attribute name SHOULD be singular. Examples: host.name, db.user, container.id.

  • When attribute can represent multiple entities, the attribute name SHOULD be pluralized and the value type SHOULD be an array. E.g. process.command_args might include multiple values: the executable name and command arguments.

  • When an attribute represents a measurement, Metric Name Pluralization Guidelines SHOULD be followed for the attribute name.

Name Reuse Prohibition

A new attribute MUST NOT be added with the same name as an attribute that existed in the past but was renamed (with a corresponding schema file).

When introducing a new attribute name check all existing schema files to make sure the name does not appear as a key of any “rename_attributes” section (keys denote old attribute names in rename operations).

Recommendations for OpenTelemetry Authors

  • All names that are part of OpenTelemetry semantic conventions SHOULD be part of a namespace.

  • When coming up with a new semantic convention make sure to check existing namespaces for Resources, Spans, and Metrics to see if the new name fits.

  • When a new namespace is necessary consider whether it should be a top-level namespace (e.g. service) or a nested namespace (e.g. service.instance).

  • Semantic conventions exist for four areas: for Resource, Span, Log, and Metric attribute names. In addition, for spans we have two more areas: Event and Link attribute names. Identical namespaces or names in all these areas MUST have identical meanings. For example the http.method span attribute name denotes exactly the same concept as the http.method metric attribute, has the same data type and the same set of possible values (in both cases it records the value of the HTTP protocol’s request method as a string).

  • Semantic conventions MUST limit names to printable Basic Latin characters (more precisely to U+0021 .. U+007E subset of Unicode code points). It is recommended to further limit names to the following Unicode code points: Latin alphabet, Numeric, Underscore, Dot (as namespace delimiter).

Recommendations for Application Developers

As an application developer when you need to record an attribute first consult existing semantic conventions for Resources, Spans, and Metrics. If an appropriate name does not exists you will need to come up with a new name. To do that consider a few options:

  • The name is specific to your company and may be possibly used outside the company as well. To avoid clashes with names introduced by other companies (in a distributed system that uses applications from multiple vendors) it is recommended to prefix the new name by your company’s reverse domain name, e.g. com.acme.shopname.

  • The name is specific to your application that will be used internally only. If you already have an internal company process that helps you to ensure no name clashes happen then feel free to follow it. Otherwise it is recommended to prefix the attribute name by your application name, provided that the application name is reasonably unique within your organization (e.g. myuniquemapapp.longitude is likely fine). Make sure the application name does not clash with an existing semantic convention namespace.

  • The name may be generally applicable to applications in the industry. In that case consider submitting a proposal to this specification to add a new name to the semantic conventions, and if necessary also to add a new namespace.

It is recommended to limit names to printable Basic Latin characters (more precisely to U+0021 .. U+007E subset of Unicode code points).

otel.* Namespace

Attribute names that start with otel. are reserved to be defined by OpenTelemetry specification. These are typically used to express OpenTelemetry concepts in formats that don’t have a corresponding concept.

For example, the otel.scope.name attribute is used to record the instrumentation scope name, which is an OpenTelemetry concept that is natively represented in OTLP, but does not have an equivalent in other telemetry formats and protocols.

Any additions to the otel.* namespace MUST be approved as part of OpenTelemetry specification.